What Jesus Really Looked Like
ARK presents a source-centered reading of the attributed narratives of Pontius Pilate, Flavius Josephus, and Publius Lentulus, set within the historical world of Judea under Tiberius Caesar and the Roman governorship of Pontius Pilate.
Across centuries of Christian conversation, art, and historical reflection, believers and researchers alike have returned to one enduring question: what did Jesus actually look like? In popular circulation, three names are frequently presented as witnesses to his appearance—Pontius Pilate, Flavius Josephus, and Publius Lentulus. When these three attributed narratives are placed side by side, they present a fascinating contrast: one is judicial and observational, one is historical and descriptive of Jesus’ public role, and one offers a vivid portrait of physical features and personal bearing.
Historical Setting: Time, Empire, and Province
To understand these accounts in context, they must be situated within the world of first-century Roman rule. Jesus’ life and ministry unfolded during the reign of Tiberius Caesar, who ruled the Roman Empire from 14 to 37 CE, and during the governorship of Pontius Pilate in Judea, commonly dated to 26–36 CE. Pilate’s name is inseparably connected to the crucifixion narratives, while Josephus, writing later in the first century, preserved one of the best-known non-Christian references to Jesus in his historical work Antiquities of the Jews. The Lentulus description, transmitted in later tradition, is the source most often cited when readers encounter a detailed visual portrait of Christ and what Jesus really looked like.
Pontius Pilate’s Attributed Narrative to Tiberius Caesar
In the narrative attributed to Pilate and commonly circulated as the Letter of Pilate to Tiberius, Jesus is presented in the setting of Roman administration and inquiry. The text is framed as an official-style communication and includes Pilate’s reflections on Jesus’ character, conduct, and unusual presence. In the version of this tradition widely circulated in Christian discussion, Pilate is also said to describe Jesus’ appearance in striking language, writing, “His golden colored hair and beard gave to his appearance a celestial aspect.” The same narrative portrays Jesus as appearing to be around thirty years of age and speaks of a countenance marked by sweetness and serenity. Within this attributed Pilate account, the emphasis is not only on judicial events but also on the impression Jesus made on those who encountered him, including the sense that his appearance carried an uncommon dignity.
TO TIBERIUS CAESAR:
A young man appeared in Galilee preaching with humble unction, a new law in the Name of the God that had sent Him. At first I was apprehensive that His design was to stir up the people against the Romans, but my fears were soon dispelled. Jesus of Nazareth spoke rather as a friend of the Romans than of the Jews. One day I observed in the midst of a group of people a young man who was leaning against a tree, calmly addressing the multitude. I was told it was Jesus. This I could easily have suspected so great was the difference between Him and those who were listening to Him. His golden colored hair and beard gave to his appearance a celestial aspect. He appeared to be about 30 years of age.
Never have I seen a sweeter or more serene countenance. What a contrast between Him and His bearers with their black beards and tawny complexions! Unwilling to interrupt Him by my presence, I continued my walk but signified to my secretary to join the group and listen. Later, my secretary reported that never had he seen in the works of all the philosophers anything that compared to the teachings of Jesus. He told me that Jesus was neither seditious nor rebellious, so we extended to Him our protection. He was at liberty to act, to speak, to assemble and to address the people. This unlimited freedom provoked the Jews — not the poor but the rich and powerful.
Later, I wrote to Jesus requesting an interview with Him at the Praetorium. He came. When the Nazarene made His appearance I was having my morning walk and as I faced Him my feet seemed fastened with an iron hand to the marble pavement and I trembled in every limb as a guilty culprit, though he was calm. For some time I stood admiring this extraordinary Man. There was nothing in Him that was repelling, nor in His character, yet I felt awed in His presence. I told Him that there was a magnetic simplicity about Him and His personality that elevated Him far above the philosophers and teachers of His day.
Now, Noble Sovereign, these are the facts concerning Jesus of Nazareth and I have taken the time to write you in detail concerning these matters. I say that such a man who could convert water into wine, change death into life, disease into health; calm the stormy seas, is not guilty of any criminal offense and as others have said, we must agree — truly this is the Son of God.
Your most obedient servant,
Pontius Pilate
Flavius Josephus and the Historical Notice in Antiquities
Flavius Josephus, by contrast, writes as a historian rather than as a governor. Born in Jerusalem in 37/38 CE and later active in Rome, Josephus composed Antiquities of the Jews around 93 CE. In the passage most often discussed in relation to Jesus, Josephus refers to him as a wise man, a teacher, and a doer of remarkable works, and he notes that Pilate condemned him to the cross at the urging of leading men. Josephus also records that Jesus’ followers continued after his death. In this narrative, however, the focus falls on Jesus’ public life, influence, and historical significance rather than on physical features. Josephus’ account contributes to the historical memory of Jesus as a teacher and movement-founder, but in the commonly cited passage it does not dwell on bodily appearance in the way later portrait traditions do.
Publius Lentulus and the Detailed Portrait Tradition
The most visually detailed of the three narratives is the account attributed to Publius Lentulus. In the Letter of Lentulus tradition, Jesus is introduced in a formal letter setting and then described with remarkable specificity. The text presents him as a man of notable and dignified presence, with hair likened in color to hazel-nut, falling in an ordered manner and parting at the top after the pattern associated in the text with the Nazarenes. His brow is described as smooth and his face as without blemish, tinged with a slight redness. The account speaks of an abundant beard matching the hair in color, divided at the chin, and eyes that are bright and expressive. Beyond physical features, the Lentulus description also emphasizes demeanor: Jesus is presented as possessing both gravity and sweetness, capable of stern rebuke and gentle admonition, with a presence that inspires both reverence and affection. The portrait extends to emotional character as well, noting tears more than laughter and describing the beauty of his posture, hands, and arms.
The following was taken from a manuscript in the possession of Lord Kelly, and in his library, and was copied from an original letter of Publius Lentullus at Rome. It being the usual custom of Roman Governors to advertise the Senate and people of such material things as happened in their provinces in the days of Tiberius Caesar, Publius Lentullus, President of Judea, wrote the following epistle to the Senate concerning the Nazarene called Jesus.
“There appeared in these our days a man, of the Jewish Nation, of great virtue, named Yeshua [Jesus], who is yet living among us, and of the Gentiles is accepted for a Prophet of truth, but His own disciples call Him the Son of God- He raiseth the dead and cureth all manner of diseases. A man of stature somewhat tall, and comely, with very reverent countenance, such as the beholders may both love and fear, his hair of (the colour of) the chestnut, full ripe, plain to His ears, whence downwards it is more orient and curling and wavering about His shoulders. In the midst of His head is a seam or partition in His hair, after the manner of the Nazarenes.
His forehead plain and very delicate; His face without spot or wrinkle, beautified with a lovely red; His nose and mouth so formed as nothing can be reprehended; His beard thickish, in colour like His hair, not very long, but forked; His look innocent and mature; His eyes grey, clear, and quick- In reproving hypocrisy He is terrible; in admonishing, courteous and fair spoken; pleasant in conversation, mixed with gravity. It cannot be remembered that any have seen Him Laugh, but many have seen Him Weep. In proportion of body, most excellent; His hands and arms delicate to behold. In speaking, very temperate, modest, and wise. A man, for His singular beauty, surpassing the children of men.”
Reading the Three Narratives Together
When these three narratives are read together, a clear pattern emerges in the way each contributes to the conversation. The Pilate tradition, as popularly circulated, offers a compact but memorable visual impression, especially in the phrase about golden-colored hair and beard and a “celestial aspect.” Josephus supplies a historical notice centered on Jesus’ wisdom, deeds, crucifixion, and enduring followers. Lentulus provides the fullest portrait, elaborating on hair, face, beard, eyes, and bearing with language that has profoundly shaped the Christian imagination. Read side by side, they form a layered literary tradition in which Jesus appears as both historical figure and figure of profound personal impression.
Why These Narratives Still Matter to Christian Readers
For Christian readers, these narratives have long served not only as historical points of interest but also as windows into how Jesus was remembered, described, and contemplated across different textual traditions. Whether encountered in historical discussion, devotional reading, or artistic reflection, the Pilate, Josephus, and Lentulus narratives continue to draw attention because they attempt, each in its own way, to answer a question that remains deeply human and deeply reverent: what did the face of Jesus look like?
Further Reading References
Readers who wish to explore the source texts and related historical context may consult the Letter of Pilate to Tiberius, Josephus’ Antiquities of the Jews (Book 18), the Publius Lentulus entry, and the general overview of the Letter of Lentulus. For historical background on the Roman period, see Tiberius Caesar, Pontius Pilate, and Flavius Josephus.
About The Author
